This is the reason that Shellsort gap sequences have a larger optimal shrink factor of about 2.2.
2.
Then the gap is divided by the shrink factor again, the list is sorted with this new gap, and the process repeats until the gap is 1.
3.
The shrink factor has a great effect on the efficiency of comb sort . " k " = 1.3 has been suggested as an ideal shrink factor by the authors of the original article after empirical testing on over 200, 000 random lists.
4.
The shrink factor has a great effect on the efficiency of comb sort . " k " = 1.3 has been suggested as an ideal shrink factor by the authors of the original article after empirical testing on over 200, 000 random lists.
5.
The gap starts out as the length of the list " n " being sorted divided by the shrink factor " k " ( generally 1.3; see below ) and one pass of the aforementioned modified bubble sort is applied with that gap.
6.
You could even use SHRINK factors up to 200 %, which would result in reversing the image, provided the invariant point is in the exact center ( since the exact center of our array is ( 199.5, 199.5 ), you'd need to either make the invariant point two real numbers, or limit the SHRINK value, to, say 199.5 % ).
मोबाइल